Advertisement

From big hands to green fingers: It is time for a change

Open AccessPublished:May 03, 2023DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jisako.2023.04.005
      It has been generally accepted that-apart from a possible natural shift through variations in the solar cycle-, human activities are the main driver of climate change. CO2 and other greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions are by far the largest contributor to global climate change.
      Healthcare is a surprisingly large source of these GHG, accounting for some 5% of global CO2 emissions. In USA it is even 10% (

      Choi-Schagrin W. How hospitals fuel climate change. 2021 (Nov 5). https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2021/11/05/climate/climate-change-health.html

      ).
      An estimated 70% comes from the supply chain and the energy to manufacture, ship and dispose medical equipment, plastic packaging and pharmaceuticals used by our hospitals every day.(

      Choi-Schagrin W. How hospitals fuel climate change. 2021 (Nov 5). https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2021/11/05/climate/climate-change-health.html

      ).
      It has been estimated that each year in USA, health damage from these pollutants produced by the health care system, are estimated at 470.000 years of life lost from pollution related disease.(

      Eckelman MJ, Sherman J. Environmental impacts of the U.S. health care system and effects on public health. PLoS ONE, 11(6): e0157014. https://doi.org/10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0157014.

      ).
      A fundamental credo of health care practice is “first do no harm”, but ironically our practice itself causes significant pollution and consequently indirect adverse effects on public health.
      Aside from this tremendous emissions footprint, health care is also one of the largest waste-producing sectors. Generating over four billion pounds of waste each year, the healthcare system in the United States is the second largest contributor of trash with one-third produced by operating rooms (
      • Wormer B.A.
      • Augenstein V.A.
      • Carpenter C.L.
      • et al.
      The green operating room: simple changes to reduce cost and our carbon footprint.
      ) In the Netherlands the artist Maria Koijck displayed the amount of waste created for one procedure, her own procedure of breast reconstruction after breast cancer. The image of herself between this waste is truly powerful (Fig 1). The video she created of the making of this picture is gripping and went instantly viral in 2021: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w28M7wjIr6E.
      Figure 1
      Figure 1The Dutch artist Maria Koijck between the waste of one procedure. Her own procedure; breast reconstruction after breast cancer. This one procedure created 6 full garbage bags of disposable waste. Sixty percent of the materials used in this procedure were disposable.
      Orthopaedic surgeons have a particularly resource intensive field. We require the strictest ‘energy intensive’ operating theatre ventilation standards, and have an intrinsic anxiety for everything that could contaminate our work space. This results in extra surgical drapes, antibiotics, rinsing, disinfectants and whatever else we have protocolized. And what to think of all these single-use items, plastic wrappers, gowns, drapes and covers.
      A hip arthroscopy for femoro-acetabular impingement produces an average of 9,4 kg of waste.(

      Sa, D. de, Stephens, K., Kuang, M., Simunovic, N., Karlsson, J., & Ayeni, O. R. (n.d.). The direct environmental impact of hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement: a surgical waste audit of five cases. https://doi.org/10.1093/jhps/hnv085.

      ) A standard primary total knee replacement (TKR) generates approximately 14 kg of waste.(
      • Stall N.M.
      • Kagoma Y.K.
      • Bondy J.N.
      • Naudie D.
      Surgical waste audit of 5 total knee arthroplasties.
      ).
      Many of our products are disposable. Some of them have dramatically improved the quality of care. We cannot imagine having to use reusable gauzes, needles or gloves. But for some products like gowns and drapes or single use instruments, or even complete disposable instrument sets there are surely more environmental friendly alternatives.
      Mahatma Ghandi once said, “If you want to change the world start with yourself.” This certainly applies to climate change.
      On a global scale we rely on international initiatives such as the Paris Agreement, phasing out fossil energy. On a national scale we rely on our governments to push for progress in renewable energy sources, reduce GHG emissions, take initiatives towards greener transportation, encourage good insulation of buildings etcetera. Many hospitals already take initiatives to reduce waste and reduce CO2 emissions.
      But all of us have the authority to bring forth positive changes as of tomorrow. We all can take our energy, effort and practices to the ‘operating’ table. “Twenty-five years ago people could be excused for not knowing much, or doing much, about climate change. Today we have no excuse.” (Desmond Tutu).(

      Tutu, D. We need an apartheid-style boycott to save the planet. The Guardian. 2014; April 10. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/apr/10/divest-fossil-fuels-climate-change-keystone-xl

      )
      Many hospitals already have installed‘ an OR green team’. If your hospital does not have one then we would encourage you to take the initiative to do so. There are several practical examples you can incorporate to make your next procedure greener and the planet more sustainable. A recent systematic review (

      Pradere B, Mallet R, de La Taille A, et al. Climate-smart Actions in the Operating Theatre for Improving Sustainability Practices: A Systematic Review. European Urology 2022 (in press). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.EURURO.2022.01.027

      ) identified five simple actions.
      • 1.
        Waste reduction by recycling, reuse and reprocessing
      Refuse, Reduce, Reuse, Repurpose and Recycle are the 5R’s of waste management. If we apply these 5R’s to a standard arthroscopy procedure, the following recommendations can be made. Refuse to use disposable (single use) instruments. Reduce the instruments on your standard trays (only use what is necessary), switch to Reusable gowns, drapes and cotton OR towels. New ‘closed waste management systems’ collect and disposes surgical waste fluid, making the plastic containers unnecessary. Repurpose is also referred to as upcycling; try to think of different uses for the product you are discarding. And lastly, Recycle, which goes hand in hand with maximizing waste segregation.
      ‘Overage’ is the term used for items opened and/or prepared for an operation but not used. Attempts to reduce overage have been made in routine hand surgery with the development of minimal packs of key surgical instruments. This resulted in a 55% reduction in instrument costs and a 13% reduction in waste.(
      • Thiel C.L.
      • Fiorin Carvalho R.
      • Hess L.
      • et al.
      Minimal Custom Pack Design and Wide-Awake Hand Surgery: Reducing Waste and Spending in the Orthopedic Operating Room.
      ) It seems this approach can be easily copied for most other orthopedic procedures.
      • 2.
        Waste reduction by segregation
      Waste destruction processes generate high GHG emissions. In the OR there are two types of waste: regulated medical waste (RMW) and domestic waste. RMW is health care related waste with the potential to spread diseases through blood or other type of contamination. RMW disposal is highly regulated, requires more energy and is more costly. Educating health care workers in proper segregation increases the weight of recyclable materials and decreases the weight of RMW. Segregation bins on the OR together with education and, ideally, a color labelling of products will help to improve waste segregation.(
      • Giakoumakis G.
      • Politi D.
      • Sidiras D.
      Medical waste treatment technologies for energy, fuels, and materials production: A review.
      ).
      • 3.
        Sterilization
      Refuse to use single use instruments and ask for proper alternatives. Redesign the procedure trays to include only the instruments necessary to perform a safe procedure including emergencies. Perhaps developing an ‘escape set’ to be opened for procedures which are more challenging.
      Single-use polypropylene packaging (blue wrap) for sterilization of surgical instruments generates serious plastic waste, estimated at 115 million Kg per year in the United States alone. Rigid sterilization containers (RSCs) are a proven and tested alternative. In general, these type of containers have 85% less environmental impact in carbon footprint.(
      • Friedericy H.J.
      • van Egmond C.W.
      • Vogtländer J.G.
      • van der Eijk A.C.
      • Jansen F.W.
      Reducing the Environmental Impact of Sterilization Packaging for Surgical Instruments in the Operating Room: A Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of Disposable versus Reusable Systems.
      ).
      • 4.
        Anesthesia gas management
      Talk with your anesthesiologist. Preferably and if possible use locoregional or spinal anesthesia. Anesthetic gases have a strong greenhouse effect. If general anesthesia is necessary use intravenous medication. When anesthetic gas has to be used, avoid desflurane, isoflurane and nitric oxygen and use sevoflurane instead. From all anesthetic gases sevoflurane has the smallest cradle-to-grave footprint.(
      • Alexander R.
      • Poznikoff B.A.
      • Malherbe B.S.
      Greenhouse gases: the choice of volatile anesthetic does matter.
      ) Other tips from anesthesiologists are: pausing gas flow during intubation, using low flow anesthesia (<1L/min) and low-fresh gas flow of sevoflurane induction in children.(
      • Singh A.
      • Sinha R.
      • Aravindan A.
      • Kumar K.R.
      • Datta P.K.
      Comparison of low-fresh gas flow technique to standard technique of sevoflurane induction in children-A randomized controlled trial.
      ).
      • 5.
        Improvement of energy use
      Explore the option and if possible reduce airflow rates overnight and in the weekends. Heating, ventilation and air conditioning (HVAC) thermal energy systems comprise 90-99% of overall energy use in the OR.(
      • MacNeill A.J.
      • Lillywhite R.
      • Brown C.J.
      The impact of surgery on global climate: a carbon footprinting study of operating theatres in three health systems.
      ) Reduce the total of stand-by operation theatres for emergencies to the safest minimum. Inform with the hospital technician what the airflow start-up time of the theatre is. It is probably shorter than the delay between the request for an emergency theatre and the patient arriving in the OR.
      The gold standard is the use of laminar flow for arthroplasty surgery. Although this has been questioned recently in a NICE review drawing no firm conclusion on the use of ultra-clean air (laminar flow) from the available evidence.(

      National Guideline Center (UK). Evidence Review for Ultra-Clean Air: Joint Replacement (Primary): Hip, Knee and Shoulder: Evidence Review I. London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). 2020 (June):157. ISBN-13: 978-1-4731-3722-6. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK561386/

      ) Still, very few arthroplasty surgeons would be willing to operate in a non-laminar flow theatre, as guidelines do still advice to use them. However, almost all other orthopedic surgeries can definitely be safely performed without. This certainly applies to arthroscopic surgery. ‘The solution to pollution is dilution’.
      Use LED lights and motion sensors, turn off (medical) devices at the end of the day. It is a persistent myth that computers use more energy to restart than just remain in sleep mode. Turning off the computers, lights and other devices at the end of the day saves energy.
      These are just a few examples and fortunately there are many more. Some you can implement yourself and straight away and for others such as reusable gowns and drapes you need to involve the hospital management. But remember that you are the captain on the ship. You have the authority to do it and for an excellent reason. Have a firm discussion with your anesthesiologist tomorrow. Ultimately the greenest procedure is the unnecessary procedure which is not performed. It has been estimated that 30 % of surgical interventions are unnecessary. () Think about it when you are considering to schedule your future patients for surgery.(
      • Van Dijk C.N.
      Minimalism and the Art of Medicine.
      ).
      In 2022 the first ‘net zero’ operation was performed at the Solihull Hospital in the UK. To do so, the entire team made adjustment to their standard practice (many of which we have mentioned above) and at the end of the operation the carbon output was reduced by almost 80%. To be truly ‘net zero’, the remaining output was offset through a variety of carbon compensation projects, including the planting of some trees on the hospital grounds.
      Remembering the words of Gathorne Robert Girdlestone: “the bone is a plant with its roots in the soft tissue and what it requires for its welfare are the skills of a gardener rather than those of a cabinet maker.” Now is the time to show orthopedic surgeons not only have strong hands but green fingers too!(
      • Subramanian P.
      • Kantharuban S.
      • Subramanian V.
      • Willis-Owen S.A.G.
      • Willis-Owen C.A.
      Orthopaedic surgeons: as strong as an ox and almost twice as clever? Multicentre prospective comparative study.
      ).

      Declaration of interests

      ☒ The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

      References

      1. Choi-Schagrin W. How hospitals fuel climate change. 2021 (Nov 5). https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2021/11/05/climate/climate-change-health.html

      2. Eckelman MJ, Sherman J. Environmental impacts of the U.S. health care system and effects on public health. PLoS ONE, 11(6): e0157014. https://doi.org/10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0157014.

        • Wormer B.A.
        • Augenstein V.A.
        • Carpenter C.L.
        • et al.
        The green operating room: simple changes to reduce cost and our carbon footprint.
        Am Surg. 2013; 79 (PMID: 23815997): 666-671
      3. Sa, D. de, Stephens, K., Kuang, M., Simunovic, N., Karlsson, J., & Ayeni, O. R. (n.d.). The direct environmental impact of hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement: a surgical waste audit of five cases. https://doi.org/10.1093/jhps/hnv085.

        • Stall N.M.
        • Kagoma Y.K.
        • Bondy J.N.
        • Naudie D.
        Surgical waste audit of 5 total knee arthroplasties.
        Can J Surg. 2013; 56: 97-102https://doi.org/10.1503/cjs.015711
      4. Tutu, D. We need an apartheid-style boycott to save the planet. The Guardian. 2014; April 10. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/apr/10/divest-fossil-fuels-climate-change-keystone-xl

      5. Pradere B, Mallet R, de La Taille A, et al. Climate-smart Actions in the Operating Theatre for Improving Sustainability Practices: A Systematic Review. European Urology 2022 (in press). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.EURURO.2022.01.027

        • Thiel C.L.
        • Fiorin Carvalho R.
        • Hess L.
        • et al.
        Minimal Custom Pack Design and Wide-Awake Hand Surgery: Reducing Waste and Spending in the Orthopedic Operating Room.
        Hand. 2019; 14 (2019): 271-276https://doi.org/10.1177/1558944717743595
        • Giakoumakis G.
        • Politi D.
        • Sidiras D.
        Medical waste treatment technologies for energy, fuels, and materials production: A review.
        Energies. 2021; 14: 8065https://doi.org/10.3390/en14238065
        • Friedericy H.J.
        • van Egmond C.W.
        • Vogtländer J.G.
        • van der Eijk A.C.
        • Jansen F.W.
        Reducing the Environmental Impact of Sterilization Packaging for Surgical Instruments in the Operating Room: A Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of Disposable versus Reusable Systems.
        Sustainabilit. 2022; 14: 430https://doi.org/10.3390/su14010430
        • Alexander R.
        • Poznikoff B.A.
        • Malherbe B.S.
        Greenhouse gases: the choice of volatile anesthetic does matter.
        Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal Canadien d’anesthésie. 2018; 65: 221-222https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-017-1006-x
        • Singh A.
        • Sinha R.
        • Aravindan A.
        • Kumar K.R.
        • Datta P.K.
        Comparison of low-fresh gas flow technique to standard technique of sevoflurane induction in children-A randomized controlled trial.
        Paediatric Anaesthesia. 2019; 29: 304-309https://doi.org/10.1111/PAN.13582
        • MacNeill A.J.
        • Lillywhite R.
        • Brown C.J.
        The impact of surgery on global climate: a carbon footprinting study of operating theatres in three health systems.
        The Lancet Planetary Health. 2017; 1: e360-e367https://doi.org/10.1016/S2542-5196(17)30162-6
      6. National Guideline Center (UK). Evidence Review for Ultra-Clean Air: Joint Replacement (Primary): Hip, Knee and Shoulder: Evidence Review I. London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). 2020 (June):157. ISBN-13: 978-1-4731-3722-6. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK561386/

      7. https://docplayer.nl/13883497-Naar-effectieve-passende-en-betaalbare-zorg.html.

        • Van Dijk C.N.
        Minimalism and the Art of Medicine.
        J ISAKOS. 2017; 2: 121-122https://doi.org/10.1136/jisakos-2017-000148
        • Subramanian P.
        • Kantharuban S.
        • Subramanian V.
        • Willis-Owen S.A.G.
        • Willis-Owen C.A.
        Orthopaedic surgeons: as strong as an ox and almost twice as clever? Multicentre prospective comparative study.
        BMJ. 2011; 343: d7506https://doi.org/10.1126/bmj.d7506